“Having a good death is not the issue. It is having a good life during our last few days, weeks, years. That is to say, death is death; it is not good or bad –just inevitable. It is the process of dying that needs our attention, but it needs it before the process starts.”
Dr. Atul Gawande, from a review of his book, Being Mortal.
Throughout this website choosing to end life, sometimes called early exit or self-deliverance or other such term, always excludes ending life by violent means and by reason of depression and insanity. Legally, they are all suicide. The right-to-die movement has not yet accepted a term to distinguish between the two. Medical Aid in Dying (MAiD) laws, discussed below, in fact say that assisted DEATHS occurring within the terms of the LAWS are not suicide. But the MAiD laws don’t say what it is!
There are many reasons why people, especially people near the end of their life anyway, choose not to wait for nature to take it course. These reasons include:
Riddle:
What is it that you can legally do yourself, but if someone helps you, he or she is committing a felony?
Keep reading for the answer.
About one third of the U.S. population has access to MAiD where a doctor may legally give you a lethal prescription, IF you qualify. New York’s law activates on August 5, 2026.
These state laws have different names. The first such law was adopted in Oregon in 1997 with the name the Death With Dignity Act. Since then these states, California (2015), Colorado (2016), Delaware (2025), Hawai’i (2018), Illinois (2025), Maine (2019), New Jersey (2019), New Mexico (2021), New York (2026), Vermont (2013), Washington (2008).have adopted quite similar laws. The District of Columbia (2016) also allows MAiD. Because of the similarity of these laws, collectively they are known as Medical Aid in Dying (MAiD). Montana does not have a MAiD law, but its Supreme Court has held that doctors may administer euthanasia. There is no data from Montana to know to what extent euthanasia or MAiD has occurred; no reporting is required.
Limitations in the MAiD laws restrict their applicability to very few of the many people suffering near death. There are three main restrictions.
Other limitations are that you must be over 18 and you must be a resident of the state where you will ingest. Due to litigation, Oregon and Vermont have dropped the residency requirement; other states will likely follow.
The process for getting the medication is arduous – another limitation. You must:
Finally you must ingest the distasteful medication; this usually means swallowing it. There are some work-arounds swallowing, but the bottom line remains the same: no one can help you. The work-arounds are a small rectal catheter or a feeding tube inserted in the nose, mouth, or stomach. A small pump may be necessary.
Have you figured out the answer to the riddle yet? What if someone helped you by holding the glass to your lips?
There’s your answer: It is not a crime to kill yourself. Suicide used to be a crime – you could go to jail or lose your property if you failed. But it is a crime to assist someone to commit suicide – except in the MAiD states where the doctors and others are exempt. However, if the doctor, or your agent, or your family help you by feeding you the medication, the exception under the MAiD laws doesn’t apply; you must take the lethal dose yourself.
Here are some miscellaneous facts about the MAiD laws:
The opponents to MAiD laws are some religious groups, primarily the Catholic church, some politically conservative groups, and some groups of disabled persons (they fear the slippery slope – saying some day they may be told or forced to end their lives).
The MAiD laws have been successful. They have survived many legal challenges. The slippery slope arguments have failed – there is no abuse. The valid criticisms of the law are its strict limitations. Many people want MAiD to be similar to Canada’s.
Canada Does it Better
“Euthanasia is not killing; it is loving.”
Peter Bolland, The Seven Stone Path (2023), p. 242
Laws in some European countries are even broader than Canada’s and have been in existence much longer. The Netherlands seems to be the most liberal.
In Canada:
Extensive recent medical research clearly indicates that with a good lifestyle you can prevent developing Alzheimer’s disease. What life style changes? (As many as you can do; the more, the better.)
This list is taken from a class on prevention given at the San Diego Community Colleges in the fall of 2022. You can get similar information from this YouTube video: Ten tips to prevent Alzheimer's, Melissa Batchelor. There are others.